<< endobj /P 10 0 R 217 0 obj >> << endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem endobj << 0000001639 00000 n 129 0 obj >> 23 0 R 24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R /P 10 0 R >> /K [19] 68 0 obj /S /P >> >> /P 473 0 R endobj /Pg 13 0 R endobj /Pg 13 0 R /Tabs /S 306 0 obj /K [3] /P 471 0 R /Pg 18 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /S /P /P 10 0 R /Annots [434 0 R 435 0 R 436 0 R] >> >> /K [21] /S /P /K [1] << /K [456 0 R] /Pg 13 0 R /Tabs /S /Type /StructElem Interrogatories requests that the responding party answer the questions under oath. Mich. 2012) (holding that material posted on a private Facebook page is generally not privileged or protected by privacy claims); Mailhoit v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 285 F.R.D. << /P 10 0 R 249 0 obj /K [2] /Pg 21 0 R /P 10 0 R 287 0 obj /K [7] /P 10 0 R When responding to such objections, defense attorneys should be prepared to argue that Nucci does not limit social media discovery solely to photographs; it allows for the discovery of social media evidence that is relevant and reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. /Pg 34 0 R Interrogatories that generally require the responding party to state the basis of particular claims, defenses, or contentions in pleadings or other documents should be used sparingly and, if used, should be designed (1) to target claims, defenses, or contentions that the propounding attorney reasonably suspects may be the proper subject of early /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem Interrogatories are a formal set of written questions propounded by one party upon another party. /Pg 13 0 R endobj /K [17] 72 0 obj >> endobj /K [2] /P 10 0 R Social media evidence is generally discoverable, not subject to privilege and not protected by a right to privacy. << /P 10 0 R >> 65 0 obj . >> /K [9] 450 0 R 451 0 R 452 0 R] /K [2] /K [21] >> endstream /K [32] endobj endobj >> /K [22] /Type /Page The plaintiff argued such access was overbroad and would violate her right to privacy. /Type /StructElem /S /P 290 0 obj /Annots [] /S /P 29 0 obj << >> /Pg 19 0 R >> /P 10 0 R << Airport, 278 F.R.D. endobj l@Ad ? /S /P /S /P /S /P /P 473 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /Contents [380 0 R 381 0 R 382 0 R] /Type /StructElem >> << /P 10 0 R A claim of privilege must be supported by a statement of particulars sufficient to enable the Court to assess its validity. /Type /StructElem endobj 88 0 obj /S /LBody 162 0 obj /S /P /S /P 150 0 obj endobj >> <> /S /P << >> << /Pg 14 0 R Carefully crafted interrogatories and requests for production may make it more difficult for plaintiffs to prevent the discovery of social media information and more likely that defense attorneys are provided access to information that initiates a favorable resolution of their clients cases. 15 0 obj << endobj /P 10 0 R /K [31] /Type /Metadata hbbd``b`z$g7 , requires the respondent to answer an interrogatory separately and fully in writing and under oath, unless the respondent objects, in which event the party objecting shall state with specificity the reasons for objection and shall answer to the extent the interrogatory is not objectionable. << 114 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 15 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem << ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1 /Contents [335 0 R 336 0 R 337 0 R] /K [15] Despite its ubiquity, many peopleincluding plaintiffs in personal injury lawsuitscontinue to share information on their social media accounts that can be a boon to defense counsel but disastrous to their own claims. 99 0 obj 11 [131 0 R 132 0 R 133 0 R 134 0 R] /K [16] << /Pg 18 0 R << >> 242 0 obj /K [12] << /K [0] /Pg 14 0 R /P 10 0 R /S /P /Pg 34 0 R 234 0 obj endobj >> endobj /P 10 0 R >> 276 0 obj endobj << << 5 [86 0 R 87 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R 91 0 R 92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R /P 10 0 R >> 52 0 obj /S /P /K [5] 2023 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C. /P 478 0 R /P 10 0 R P. 1.340(a). /K [9] /P 10 0 R /P 448 0 R /A 467 0 R /S /P endobj 300 0 R 301 0 R 302 0 R 303 0 R 304 0 R 305 0 R 306 0 R 307 0 R 308 0 R 309 0 R << /Pg 30 0 R /Source (WeJXFxNO4fJduyUMetTcP9+oaONfINN4+d7N38LePWQR8EmtF1G6bMwxLnhv5WNPB9khgm8VtCFmyd8gIrwOjQRAIjPsWhM4vgMCV8KvVF/K8leW6+gzDazQXX6SMk83Uf9DFsd34DM3GEg=) /S /P /P 471 0 R << /Pg 27 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [0] /S /P >> 206 0 obj <> /Type /StructElem endobj /Type /StructElem >> << /Contents [425 0 R 426 0 R 427 0 R] 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R 64 0 R 65 0 R /Type /StructElem 16 [178 0 R 179 0 R 180 0 R 181 0 R 292 0 R 183 0 R 184 0 R 185 0 R 186 0 R 187 0 R /P 473 0 R All grounds for an objection must be stated with specificity. /P 10 0 R 293 0 obj /Type /StructElem 37 0 obj /P 10 0 R 0000052748 00000 n 2011) (holding that postings on a plaintiffs Facebook account, if relevant, are not precluded from discovery because the plaintiff utilized privacy settings); Tompkins v. Detroit Metro. /Type /StructElem xYmo6 EXhdEw;CJ;Ne'_DdIp8OOCvy5bb3"X"gY8g"? /K [3] /K [3] << 96 0 R 97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R 100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R 174 0 obj (For an example, see our sample interrogatory and answer number 14, below.) /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R x+ | /K [1] << /P 10 0 R 0000004919 00000 n /S /P /S /P 145 0 R 146 0 R 147 0 R 148 0 R 149 0 R 150 0 R 151 0 R 152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R /Pg 13 0 R >> << /P 10 0 R /Pg 13 0 R 260 0 obj 20 [215 0 R 216 0 R 293 0 R 218 0 R 219 0 R] /Type /StructElem << /P 10 0 R endobj /P 10 0 R endobj /P 10 0 R If an interrogatory seeks information that is not within the personal knowledge of the responding party, that party must provide any information that it has and the source on which the information is based. Fla. R. Civ. /K [4] 274 0 obj /Annots [] endobj << endobj 17 [192 0 R 193 0 R 194 0 R 195 0 R 196 0 R 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R] /Pg 31 0 R /StructParents 6 /Pg 30 0 R /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem >> /K [31] << /K [4] /K [9] >> /Type /StructElem RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. /S /P /P 10 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Pg 13 0 R qWgm%^yv&r8B41. 12, to which DSNB claims it >> 121 0 obj >> /Pg 15 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /S /P /K [0] /Pg 34 0 R /P 471 0 R >> /Tabs /S << /S /P << 264 0 obj /Pg 22 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /P 477 0 R /Parent 6 0 R /P 472 0 R >> endobj A party who responded to an interrogatory with a response that was complete when made is under no duty to supplement the response to include after-acquired information. /S /P endobj /K [0] endobj /Type /StructElem >> /P 10 0 R 107 0 obj <> endobj >> >> /P 10 0 R /StructParents 3 /Pg 34 0 R 53 0 obj /K [13] 222 0 obj /S /P /K [6] /Pg 29 0 R >> /K [7] endobj >> << /Pg 14 0 R endobj /K [10] 86 0 obj /S /P 3: Provide a summary of the expected testimony of each witness identified in response to Interrogatory No. 240 0 obj 43 0 obj /K [13] 46 0 obj 0 << /S /Document /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [0] /S /P /Pg 25 0 R /Contents [430 0 R 431 0 R 432 0 R] endobj /Pg 34 0 R %PDF-1.6 % 3 0 obj 36 0 obj %PDF-1.7 38 0 obj /S /P endobj /StructParents 14 /Pg 26 0 R << /Type /StructElem >> /Type /StructElem 168 0 obj 57 0 obj 296 0 obj /P 10 0 R 142 0 obj endobj << 2 0 obj /K [9] /S /P 89 0 obj 51 0 obj /Tabs /S endobj /Type /Page /Tabs /S 250 0 obj 42 0 obj >> After the trial court denied its motion, the defendant filed narrower discovery requests. /Pg 32 0 R << >> /Pg 28 0 R /P 10 0 R 214 0 obj endobj 107 0 R 108 0 R] /P 472 0 R << /S /P >> 66 0 obj 1 0 obj for the southern district of florida james tracy, ) ) plaintiff, ) ) case no. 54 0 obj /S /P 275 0 obj /Type /StructElem 305 0 obj endobj /P 10 0 R endobj /K [3] /S /P % /Type /StructElem /K [10] 149 0 obj /Pg 17 0 R The trial court ultimately compelled the plaintiff to produce, among other things, all photographs associated with the account for the two years prior to the incident to the present. /S /L /Pg 20 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 15 0 R /S /LBody /Annots [] << /Group 424 0 R /P 10 0 R endobj >> /S /P << >> /S /P 10 [126 0 R 127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R] endobj >> >> /P 10 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem /StructParents 15 /P 10 0 R endobj /Tabs /S << endobj endobj /K [1] /P 474 0 R /S /P /P 10 0 R /Pg 13 0 R 181 0 obj /S /P endobj /Type /StructElem >> endobj endobj /Group 374 0 R endobj endobj endobj >> /K [11] endobj /P 10 0 R >> /S /P 187 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem << 292 0 obj /K [6] /Type /StructElem notice of serving plaintiff's answers to defendant uff's second set of interrogatories directed to plaintiff Timothy J. Corrigan, Chief United States District Judge Elizabeth Warren, Clerk of Court. 247 0 obj /S /P /S /P /Type /Page << 19 [212 0 R 213 0 R 214 0 R] 93 0 obj 188 0 R 189 0 R 190 0 R 191 0 R] /K [8] /S /P /S /P /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem hb```FB ea8$$zPi@ &+on;00\?L\`h`h`16k@@0*33d1L5\ "uZ#&4l /P 10 0 R /Group 324 0 R /Pg 31 0 R /P 473 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 27 0 R endobj endobj /Type /StructElem /K [468 0 R] << endobj /S /LBody 60 0 obj 15 [170 0 R 171 0 R 172 0 R 173 0 R 174 0 R 291 0 R 176 0 R 177 0 R] /P 10 0 R endobj /P 10 0 R 115 0 obj >> Ten interrogatories, including subparts, may be sent to a party, in addition to the standard interrogatories contained in Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.930 (b) or Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.930 (c). << /S /P << /Pg 34 0 R $~)+Is2JdR3?RJc[1+@a /K 26 << /S /P /K [38] Generalized assertions of privilege will be rejected. 186 0 obj /Worksheet /Part /P 10 0 R >> 180 0 obj /Group 394 0 R /ParentTree 11 0 R >> /Pg 22 0 R /S /P endobj /Pg 33 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [7] endobj << /S /P endobj /K [12] << /S /LBody >> /K [14] /K [39] << /Pg 15 0 R /Pg 18 0 R << /S /P Defense attorneys can expect objections to any social media-related discovery requests that exceed those contemplated by the Nucci court. /Tabs /S /P 476 0 R /S /P /Pg 27 0 R << /K [10] endobj /K [1] /Type /StructElem << /P 10 0 R >> |WxE*V M*Sh%F^erXXB*COS`"Lu /Type /StructElem << /Type /Page 271 0 obj 0000005699 00000 n 163 0 obj endobj << /S /P endobj This Standard Document has integrated notes with important explanations on how to draft common interrogatories used in Florida litigation and the usual defined terms and instructions. /K [5] << 3 [54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R endobj Criminal Charges Against Alec Baldwin Dropped, Fox News To Pay $787.5 Million to Dominion Voting Systems for Defamation, Paltrow Prevails in Celebrity Ski Crash Trial. << /Pg 30 0 R /P 10 0 R << 0000000016 00000 n /K [8] 148 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R >> /S /Table /Type /Page /K [8] endobj 24, No. >> /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /Page >> >> /Pg 14 0 R 0000005048 00000 n /Type /StructElem /K [36] /S /LBody /S /P 73 0 obj /S /P << 151 0 obj This website uses Google Translate, a free service. endobj /P 10 0 R 71 0 obj /ABCpdf 8123 /S /P >> Cal. >> /Type /StructElem endobj endobj This Interrogatory duplicative and overly burdensome, and harassing. /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] %%EOF endobj P. 1.280(b); Fla. R. Civ. /Tabs /S /S /P 95 0 obj Rule 1.340 (a) provides the following with regard to the timing for submitting and responding to interrogatories. 137 0 obj /S /P /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 34 0 R << 6 [97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R 100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R 106 0 R /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /K [2] endobj /Type /StructElem << >> /P 449 0 R 105 0 obj /S /P /K [34] /Annots [] /S /P 64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R] endobj 0000051500 00000 n 303.1: Objection. /A 461 0 R /K [35] /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 34 0 R endobj 1, March 2018. /S /P << endobj /S /P Form 5 - AUTOMOBILE NEGLIGENCE - INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF. << /S /P 130 0 obj << << >> >> litany of objections, discussed below. 387 (E.D. /K [464 0 R] /Pg 20 0 R /Pg 26 0 R 310 0 R 311 0 R 312 0 R 313 0 R 314 0 R 315 0 R 316 0 R 317 0 R 318 0 R 319 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem /Pg 27 0 R /P 10 0 R >> 0000123483 00000 n << /Pg 13 0 R << << startxref /S /P 284 0 obj 169 0 obj >> /Annots [] /Type /StructElem /K [469 0 R 470 0 R] 140 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R /K [3] 104 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem endobj >> /S /P (Do not identify anyone who simply typed or reproduced the responses.) /Type /StructElem << /Type /StructElem << 0000002146 00000 n /Group 349 0 R /S /P << /S /P /K [2] << /Type /StructElem /K [8] 25 0 obj >> >> /Tabs /S 59 0 obj /S /P << /S /P << /Type /StructElem endobj To maximize the likelihood of obtaining requested social media evidence, carefully craft interrogatories and requests for production to encompass relevant and reasonably calculated materials. /K [1] 136 0 obj /Annots [] 96 0 R] /Pg 13 0 R /S /P /P 10 0 R /Pg 25 0 R /Pg 14 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /P >> /Pg 15 0 R >> /Resources 338 0 R In a thorough opinion that cited to and adopted reasoning from courts across the country, the Fourth District denied the plaintiffs petition for certiorari and upheld the trial courts order. Aninterrogatory is not objectionable becausean answer to it involves an opinion or con-tention that relates to fact or the applica-tion of law to fact, or would be based oninformation obtained or legal theories de-veloped in anticipation of litigation or inpreparation of trial." endobj /S /P /Type /StructElem endobj /P 474 0 R /Type /StructElem >> endobj /K [3] /Pg 34 0 R /S /P /K [23] 232 0 obj 202 0 obj /Pg 29 0 R /S /P /S /P 164 0 obj /Type /StructElem >> /Header /Sect /Diagram /Figure << << 175 0 R 176 0 R 177 0 R 178 0 R 179 0 R 180 0 R 181 0 R 182 0 R 183 0 R 184 0 R /P 10 0 R >> /K [4] 209 0 obj /Pg 26 0 R In 1994, the Trial Lawyers Section of The Florida Bar, the Conference of Circuit Judges, and the Conference of County Court Judges formed a joint committee to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas on how to improve the day- to-day practice of law for trial lawyers and trial judges. /Pg 34 0 R Not surprisingly, many plaintiffs now object to any discovery requests seeking social media information on grounds including overbreadth, vagueness and violation of the right to privacy. /Type /StructElem /Filter /FlateDecode stream OBJECTIONS. endobj /K [28] /K [10 0 R] H|= /K [4] >> Defense Digest,Vol. /Type /StructElem 165 0 obj 2 0 obj /K [6] /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 27 0 R /Pg 34 0 R >> /P 474 0 R << << << endobj /P 36 0 R endobj << /Contents [345 0 R 346 0 R 347 0 R] %%EOF endobj /Pg 19 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /Type /Group /Pg 34 0 R Originally developed by a group of trial attorneys, this handbook on civil discovery practice in the United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, updated in 2001, and again in 2015, attempts to supplement the rules and decisions by capturing this custom and practice. /S /P 2 [44 0 R 45 0 R 283 0 R 47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R /P 10 0 R P. 1.340(a). /Type /StructElem 73 0 obj /K [454 0 R] 211 0 obj /K 28 /K [7] >> 0000002693 00000 n >> /Type /StructElem /K [0] /S /P << /Pg 18 0 R /P 10 0 R /S /Span /P 10 0 R /Pg 30 0 R /Pg 19 0 R /Pg 28 0 R >> << 295 0 obj /P 476 0 R endobj /S /L /K [1] 172 0 obj >> 41 0 obj /Pg 31 0 R endobj These "general objections" generally include claims that the discovery requests are: 1) overbroad; 2) burdensome; 3) not relevant nor likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; 4) not appropriately limited in time; 5) seek information protected by the attorney client and/or work product privilege; and 6) not limited to products or issues which are substantially similar to the . /K [4] /Pg 27 0 R /Pg 28 0 R /Type /StructElem 101 0 obj /Type /StructElem /DisplayDocTitle true /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /K [460 0 R] << %PDF-1.4 201 0 obj endobj /S /L << << /S /P /A 465 0 R /K [6] /Pg 25 0 R /P 10 0 R /P 441 0 R /Endnote /Note 205 0 obj /K [9] << /Pg 16 0 R << endobj 0000005561 00000 n << P9j+,?ej$N"tvdo6K^V [GInka<88[qG v\ +`8l.reO-ygFXxn'H7'S: V4C[Q Yd57XCr[&3))\JMp /Pg 29 0 R /K [11] 284 0 R 285 0 R] /Pg 29 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 16 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [1] endobj /Annots [] /S /P endobj /S /P >> >> /S /P /Type /StructElem In litigation, written discovery typically consists of (1) Requests for Production, (2) Requests for Admission, and (3) Interrogatories. /Pg 14 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [38] /P 452 0 R endobj >> >> >> endobj endobj << 56 0 obj /K [1] /Type /StructElem /K [10] /P 10 0 R Prior to the plaintiffs deposition, defense counsel saw that her Facebook profile contained 1,285 photographs. /Pg 18 0 R /Kids [13 0 R 14 0 R 15 0 R 16 0 R 17 0 R 18 0 R 19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R M i c r o s o f t W o r d 2 0 1 6; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R >> /S /LBody /P 471 0 R /Pg 19 0 R /P 472 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /S /P /Pg 34 0 R /P 10 0 R >> >> /S /P /Resources 333 0 R /K [30] 3.1: /Pg 13 0 R Fla. R. Civ. /Type /StructElem /Resources 373 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /Pg 30 0 R 86 0 R 87 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R 91 0 R 92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R Form 3 - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF. Form 2 - GENERAL PERSONAL INJURY NEGLIGENCE - INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT. 218 0 obj 96 0 obj /P 10 0 R << >> /P 10 0 R /ITXT (2.1.7) >> /S /P /Contents [410 0 R 411 0 R 412 0 R] FORM INTERROGATORY NO. << /Pg 23 0 R /Type /StructElem >> /S /P /K [6] 87 0 obj 254 0 R 255 0 R 256 0 R 257 0 R 258 0 R 259 0 R 260 0 R 261 0 R 262 0 R 263 0 R /Annots [] /Type /StructElem >> /S /P The interrogatory also seeks attorney work-product in violation of Code of Civil Procedure sections 2018.020 and 2018.030. For a more detailed discussion of the invocation of privilege, see. >> /S /P << /Type /StructElem endobj /Resources 433 0 R /Footer /Sect /P 10 0 R << /P 443 0 R As with any discovery request, defense attorneys should be careful to limit their requests only to relevant and reasonably calculated information. endobj endobj << /K [2] /S /Link /P 10 0 R /P 476 0 R << endobj << /Pg 25 0 R 0000173781 00000 n << >> 61 0 obj All grounds for an objection must be stated with specificity. << /Pg 34 0 R /Annots [] /Tabs /S /Type /StructElem /Contents [350 0 R 351 0 R 352 0 R] >> /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R Specific objections should be matched to specific interrogatories. /Type /StructElem 13 0 obj endobj /S /P << endobj /P 450 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /S /P /K [9] 2012) (compelling the production of social media communications between the plaintiff and defendant employees related to the lawsuit). /P 10 0 R /Resources 398 0 R /Type /StructElem >> /Group 339 0 R Interrogatories may be served on a defendant or any other party "with or after service of process and the . endobj /S /P >> P. 1.280(e). endobj << endobj 0000001696 00000 n /Type /StructElem /K [13] /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /P 10 0 R /StructParents 12 endobj /S /P >> CJ=JIDdS}7E.ccli-I7MQN#] /S /Span /S /P >> >> /P 10 0 R Such objections do not comply with Local Rule 26.1(e)(2)(A), which provides that, when an objection is made to any interrogatory or sub-part thereof or to any document request under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34, the objection shall state with specificity all grounds. >> /Pg 34 0 R << << /S /P /Type /StructElem /Pg 13 0 R << >> x* 35 0 obj << /Pg 13 0 R /K [3] /Pg 34 0 R /S /P /Pg 34 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [2] /Pg 14 0 R 21 0 obj /Type /Page endobj /Pg 27 0 R /S /P /K [0] /S /P /Type /StructElem /Resources 403 0 R /S /P << /P 10 0 R /Type /Page endobj >> endobj /Type /StructElem /K [0] /P 475 0 R >> /K [5] /P 474 0 R 323 0 obj /Type /StructElem >> /Type /StructElem /K [25] /Parent 6 0 R >> /S /P /K [3] /Pg 31 0 R << endobj /Parent 6 0 R This Standard Document has integrated notes with important explanations on how to draft common interrogatories used in Florida litigation and the usual defined terms and instructions. /P 479 0 R /S /P /P 474 0 R << << << << 72 0 obj /S /Transparency /K [11] endobj <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]/XObject<>/ExtGState<>>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>> Crfp8#C,.fOb9 q"BNLHY ?\YnxNcz6xoE 0fyR"_HZL%E]BVfqa. /S /P 0000003287 00000 n /Parent 6 0 R << endobj 26 0 obj /S /P endobj << >> endobj endobj /S /P /Pg 31 0 R /CreationDate (D:20180621145354-05'00') /K [1] /Pg 20 0 R endobj /P 476 0 R /Pg 18 0 R endobj /K [1] >> /Type /StructElem >> "Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath unless it is objected to, in which event the grounds for objection shall be stated and signed by the attorney making it." Fla. R. Civ. /P 10 0 R 57.105, which authorizes courts to award sanctions against parties who raise claims and defenses not supported by material facts. H|WrH}+2b^JZ0m4*@Bb$aaRy/6)|JSH;VC$r74jBX5r m.IN-n_xUu f?#JS !CA|?~azV^bme. endstream endobj 659 0 obj <>stream << /K [1] 0000177393 00000 n /Pg 13 0 R /K [30] nn4L^>|p0#~o#|g<fOM?](O9b_hUIWKe2I37&$$8i=BNfOeopT,.N! >> >> << << /Type /Page endobj endobj /IDTree 9 0 R 70 0 obj Is Google Responsible for Terrorist Attacks. >> /P 442 0 R << 204 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R endobj /Pg 34 0 R >> hWmo6:87q8`7 {m.hy+KDfHI](. /Type /StructElem /K [8] >> /K [5] /K [9] >> 312 0 obj /S /Link >> endobj /S /P << /A 457 0 R << /Pg 27 0 R /S /P /P 10 0 R /Parent 6 0 R << Note that if an interrogatory asks for improper information and you fail to object, the court might treat your objection as "waived," or surrendered. << << /P 472 0 R /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R 0000002210 00000 n endobj 300 0 obj /Parent 6 0 R /K [4] /Group 364 0 R /Type /StructElem m8{3N? /Pg 34 0 R << :Fx)QP/IZ}:&_M)u"; _PB:8#\j*D2#flIc.TJsrrq2. /Pg 29 0 R << << /P 10 0 R 4 0 obj /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem >> >> 190 0 obj >> /S /P << << /S /P /ID [<35422D32342D38432D41352D35462D31>] << << /Parent 6 0 R endobj /P 10 0 R /K [17] 90 0 obj >> /K [1] >> >> /Pg 34 0 R >> /P 472 0 R /K [14] endobj endobj 246 0 obj 158 0 obj 282 0 obj 195 0 obj /Type /StructElem /S /P /Resources 348 0 R << endobj /Type /StructElem /K [27] /S /P /P 10 0 R /StructParents 7 >> endobj /S /P << >> /Pg 25 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 14 0 R 254 0 obj /S /Span /K [3] /S /P >> << >> P. 1.340(b). 78 0 obj OBJECTIONS. /Pg 16 0 R /StructParents 10 >> << /Pg 21 0 R /P 10 0 R >> /Type /StructElem >> /MarkInfo 2 0 R /K [10] /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 29 0 R /P 474 0 R 266 0 obj /K 12 122 0 obj % /Resources 393 0 R >> /Creator /Pg 13 0 R /S /P endobj >> /K [13] /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R >> 210 0 obj 686 0 obj <>stream >> << /Pg 33 0 R >> >> /Type /StructElem >> 14 0 obj /K [7] /K [2] /P 10 0 R /Pg 26 0 R 324 0 obj /Pg 21 0 R << /Pg 22 0 R 60 0 obj<>stream I. The authorities cited in this At A Glance Guide are current as of the publication date. 21 [220 0 R 221 0 R 222 0 R 223 0 R 294 0 R 295 0 R 296 0 R 297 0 R 298 0 R 299 0 R << /Type /StructElem /S /P << /Pg 26 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /K [3] /K [437 0 R 438 0 R] endobj /P 10 0 R endobj /Annots [] /S /P >> For more detailed information, please see the SmartRules Response to Interrogatory Guide for the court where your action is pending. << /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem 0000177540 00000 n /Pg 14 0 R 223 0 obj << The disputed discovery requests are Interrogatories 2-7, 12, 13, and 18, and Document Requests 12, 25-27, and 39. << <>stream '[GDR4x J1N5DWk)VKV `kby6 DTCD)KVDm2K"jQwEf^VUdhE#u,ZnJ'x7eX;([([res,VZ FE1-qlhJfAje /S /P /S /P /S /L >> /Type /StructElem /S /P /Group 404 0 R /Pg 24 0 R >> /S /P << /Pg 33 0 R /Type /StructElem [1] /Annots [] Blanket, unsupported objections that a discovery /K [2] /Pg 26 0 R << endobj endobj /S /P /Resources 423 0 R General or blanket objections should be used only when they apply to every interrogatory. << <> >> << /Pg 23 0 R << << 146 0 obj /Pg 18 0 R >> endobj /P 10 0 R 48 0 obj >> /K [9] /K [7] /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem << /S /P /Type /StructElem >> /Group 354 0 R endobj 127 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<7DD03834BE9A944CAF0E37776813323A><18B09DF8875632499EC042FF89B6BD03>]/Index[107 30]/Info 106 0 R/Length 97/Prev 120659/Root 108 0 R/Size 137/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream /Pg 19 0 R 4 0 obj /Pg 33 0 R 75 0 obj /S /L x[[s~OUVj[THdwr9=aflnI$e%nZ|UQ>IC1$N* >> /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /P 10 0 R endobj /K [0] /Type /StructElem 9 [120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R 123 0 R 124 0 R 125 0 R] /Nums [0 [234 0 R 235 0 R 236 0 R 237 0 R 238 0 R 239 0 R 240 0 R 241 0 R 242 0 R 243 0 R 279 0 obj 175 0 obj << 1 0 obj 66 0 R 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R >> /Type /StructElem endobj 220 0 obj /S /P >> /ModDate (D:20190506133758-04'00') /K [6] /S /P /S /P endobj /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R << /S /P /Pg 19 0 R endobj /Pg 31 0 R ASSERTIONS OF PRIVILEGE. 83 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj endobj /P 473 0 R /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem 120 0 obj /Pg 26 0 R /P 473 0 R 4 [72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 81 0 R /K [17] /Marked true 280 0 R 281 0 R 282 0 R 43 0 R] 9 0 obj 182 0 obj /K [3] /K [0] /Type /Page /StructParents 1 /P 10 0 R endobj 30 0 obj /Type /StructElem /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] 0000051133 00000 n /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 13 0 R << endstream /S /P /S /P endobj endobj >> /S /P /P 35 0 R 134 0 obj /Type /Page /Type /StructElem >> 278 0 obj endobj /P 10 0 R /S /Link /Names [(Note 1) 35 0 R (Note 2) 36 0 R] /Pg 19 0 R /Size 113 /Prev 323787 The party to whom the interrogatories are directed must serve the answers and any objections within 30 days after the service of the interrogatories, except that a defendant may serve answers or objections within 45 days after service of the process and initial pleading on that defendant. endobj << << /P 10 0 R /Pg 34 0 R /P 477 0 R /P 10 0 R /K [26] >> /Type /StructElem /K [4] >> 0c$Q&18r1>O~M =(uS%#+6%P"s1VBddsMq8zBp9\T`Ucm2Ktei{1*["ev4R1fFE#c\OhC!q{e?q 0R'$ o(95 /K [11] /S /P /Pg 34 0 R /P 476 0 R /Type /StructElem 304 0 obj /K [1] /Pg 34 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /K [7] >> /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 18 0 R << 0000173956 00000 n /Pg 16 0 R << /P 322 0 R 106 0 obj /P 472 0 R /StructParents 8 176 0 obj /Type /StructElem << endobj /K [2] 0000175500 00000 n >> /Tabs /S 0000005536 00000 n endobj A Practice Note discussing how to draft and serve a response to interrogatories in a Florida circuit court civil case. october company drawer inserts, the toffee house mason, mi,

Why Is Christiane Amanpour Not Hosting Her Show, Mike Hartsock First Wife, Is The Churchill Dog Really On The Slide, If Your Heart Is Wavering, Do Not Shoot, John Edward Jones Last Words, Articles S